PDF-версия
Б.Н. Рыжов - Системная психология
Б.Н. Рыжов - История псих-ой мысли
Содержание №36 2020

Теория и метод системной психологии

Рыжов Б. Н. Система мотивационных оппозиций как основа психологической индивидуальности (c переводом на английский язык)

Психологические исследования

Романова Е. С., Сомова Н. Г. Системное исследование качества жизни в пожилом и преклонном возрасте
=” Круглова Е. А., Попель Н. В. Системный подход к исследованию профессиональных деструкций личности педагогов
Еськов К. Н. Стили инструментального поведения операторов при выполнении гомеостатических задач
Филясова Ю. А. Моделирование конструкта личности перфекционистов
Карпов А. Б., Смирнова М. В. Эволюция системных представлений о трудовой мотивации
Горбунова И. В. Системный анализ деятельности руководителей общеобразовательных организаций

История психологии и психология истории

Артамонова Е. Р., Лобанов Е. В. Системные идеи в творческом наследии П. П. Блонского
Иванов Д. В. Системные представления о человека борющемся в отечественной психологической мысли XVI века

Наши юбиляры

Юбилей Евгении Сергеевны Романовой!

Информация

Сведения об авторах журнала «Системная психология и социология», 2020, № 4 (36)
Наши партнеры

WWW.SYSTEMPSYCHOLOGY.RU

Журнал » 2012 №5 : Титульный лист № 5 (I) 2012

  Просмотров: 4623

Всероссийское периодическое издание 

Научно-практический журнал

 

 

 

 

Системная психология

  и социология

 

  

№ 5 (I) 2012

 

 

 

 

Выходит 2 раза в год 

 

 

 

Москва

2012
 

 

Системная психология и социология: Всероссийское периодическое издание научно- 

практический журнал. – М.: МГПУ, 2012. – № 5 (I). –140c. 

 

ISSN 2223-6880 

 

 

 

Редакционная коллегия 

Романова Евгения Сергеевна (главный редактор), 

Арзуманов Юрий Леонидович, Абушкин Борис Михайлович, 

Бавро Николай Игоревич, Бершедова Людмила Ивановна, 

Гостев Александр Николаевич, Дубровина Ирина Владимировна, 

Рыжов Борис Николаевич (зам. гл. редактора) 

Тюков Анатолий Александрович 

 

Редакционный совет 

Рыжов Борис Николаевич (председатель, Москва), 

Ананишнев Владимир Максимович (зам. председателя, Москва),  

Визель Татьяна Григорьевна (Москва), Волкова Елена Николаевна (Нижний Новгород), 

Георгиева Росица (София, Болгария), Дмитриев Анатолий Васильевич (Москва), 

Забродин Юрий Михайлович (Москва), Иванников Вячеслав Андреевич (Москва), 

Коган Борис Михайлович (Москва), Леньков Сергей Леонидович (Тверь), 

Романова Евгения Сергеевна (Москва), Рац Александр Яковлевич (Санкт-Петербург), 

Сальницкий Вячеслав Петрович (Москва), Собкин Владимир Самуилович (Москва), Урываев Юрий Викторович (Москва) 

Журнал зарегистрирован в Федеральной службе по надзору за соблюдением законодательства в сфере массовых коммуникаций

 

Регистрационный номер ПИ № ФС77-37716 от 29.09.2009 г.

 

Учредитель: Московский городской педагогический университет 

Подписной индекс издания: 83333 

Зав. редакцией Чибискова О.В. 

Директор Интернет-версии журнала Белоусов А.С. 

 

Адрес редакции: Москва, Петровско-Разумовский пр., 27 

Тел. +7 495 612 6716 

E-mail: info@systempsychology.ru 

Электронная версия журнала зарегистрирована в Федеральной службе по надзору за соблюдением законодательства в сфере массовых коммуникаций 

Регистрационный номер ЭИ № AC77-37715 от 29.09.2009 г.

 

www.systempsychology.ru       

© ГБОУ ВПО МГПУ, 2012


     Читать полностью...
 

Журнал » 2011 №3 : Титульный лист 2011 №3

  Просмотров: 4723

 

Всероссийское периодическое издание

Научно-практический журнал

 

 

 

«Системная психология

 и социология»

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011, № 3

 

 

 

Выходит 2 раза в год

 

 

 

 

ISSN: 2223 -6880

 

Редакционная коллегия

 

Романова Евгения Сергеевна (главный редактор),

Арзуманов Юрий Леонидович, Абушкин Борис Михайлович,

 Бавро Николай Игоревич, Бершедова Людмила Ивановна,

Гостев Александр Николаевич, Дубровина Ирина Владимировна,

Рыжов Борис Николаевич (зам. гл. редактора)

Тюков Анатолий Александрович

 

 

Редакционный совет

 

Рыжов Борис Николаевич (председатель, Москва),

Ананишнев Владимир Максимович (зам. председателя, Москва),

Визель Татьяна Григорьевна (Москва), Волкова Елена Николаевна (Нижний Новгород),

Георгиева Росица (София, Болгария), Дмитриев Анатолий Васильевич (Москва),

Забродин Юрий Михайлович (Москва), Иванников Вячеслав Андреевич (Москва),

Коган Борис Михайлович (Москва), Леньков Сергей Леонидович (Тверь),

Романова Евгения Сергеевна (Москва), Рац Александр Яковлевич (Санкт-Петербург),

Сальницкий Вячеслав Петрович (Москва), Собкин Владимир Самуилович (Москва), Урываев Юрий Викторович (Москва)

 

Журнал зарегистрирован в Федеральной службе по надзору за соблюдением законодательства в сфере массовых коммуникаций

Регистрационный номер ПИ № ФС77-37716 от 29.09.2009 г.

 

Учредитель: Московский городской педагогический университет

 

Подписной индекс издания: 83333

Зав. Редакцией Чибискова О.В.

Директор интернет − версии журнала Белоусов А.С.

Адрес редакции: Москва, Петровско-Разумовский пр., 27

Тел. +7 495 612 6716

E-mail: info@systempsychology.ru

Электронная версия журнала зарегистрирована в Федеральной службе по надзору за соблюдением законодательства в сфере массовых коммуникаций

Регистрационный номер ЭИ № AC77-37715 от 29.09.2009 г.

http://www.systempsychology.ru

© ГОУ ВПО МГПУ, 2011


     Читать полностью...
 

Журнал » 2010 том 1 № 2 : Титульный лист

  Просмотров: 6060

Всероссийское периодическое издание

Научно-практический журнал

 

 

 

«Системная психология

 и социология»

 

 

 

 

 

2010, том 1, № 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Редакционная коллегия

 

Романова Евгения Сергеевна (главный редактор),

Арзуманов Юрий Леонидович,

Абушкин Борис Михайлович, Бавро Николай Игоревич,

Гостев Александр Николаевич, Дубровина Ирина Владимировна,

Рыжов Борис Николаевич (зам. гл. редактора)

Тюков Анатолий Александрович

 

 

Редакционный совет

 

Рыжов Борис Николаевич (председатель, Москва),

Ананишнев Владимир Максимович (зам. председателя, Москва),

Визель Татьяна Григорьевна (Москва), Волкова Елена Николаевна (Нижний Новгород),

Георгиева Росица (София, Болгария), Дмитриев Анатолий Васильевич (Москва),

Забродин Юрий Михайлович (Москва), Иванников Вячеслав Андреевич (Москва),

Коган Борис Михайлович (Москва), Леньков Сергей Леонидович (Тверь),

Романова Евгения Сергеевна (Москва), Рац Александр Яковлевич (Санкт-Петербург),

Сальницкий Вячеслав Петрович (Москва), Собкин Владимир Самуилович (Москва), Урываев Юрий Викторович (Москва)

 

Журнал зарегистрирован в Федеральной службе по надзору за соблюдением законодательства в сфере массовых коммуникаций

Регистрационный номер ПИ № ФС77-37716 от 29.09.2009 г.

 

Учредитель: Московский городской педагогический университет

 

Зав. Редакцией Чибискова О.В.

Директор интернет − версии журнала Белоусов А.С.

Адрес: Москва, Петровско-Разумовский пр., 27

Тел. (495) 656-06-21

E-mail: info@systempsychology.ru

Электронная версия журнала зарегистрирована в Федеральной службе по надзору за соблюдением законодательства в сфере массовых коммуникаций

Регистрационный номер ЭИ № AC77-37715 от 29.09.2009 г.

http://www.systempsychology.ru


     Читать полностью...
 

Журнал » 2010 том 1 № 1 : Обращение редакции

  Просмотров: 12412

 

Дорогие коллеги!

 

Журнал «Системная психология и социология» публикует оригинальные теоретические и эмпирические работы, методические разработки, архивные материалы и переводы, посвященные системным исследованиям в широком спектре наук о человеке и обществе. Первые номера журнала посвящены, главным образом, теоретико-методологическим проблемам системных описаний в психологии и социологии. В последующих номерах журнала будут шире представлены  результаты эмпирических и экспериментальных исследований.
Журнал призван содействовать консолидации усилий специалистов, применяющих системный метод в психологии, социологии и смежных с ними специальностях, а также информировать о новых методиках, технологиях и ре¬зультатах системных исследований в этих дисциплинах.
Журнал выходит четыре раза в год. Электронная версия журнала публикуется на сайте www.systempsychology.ru. Редакция приглашает к сотрудничеству всех авторов, заинтересованных системными исследованиям в науках о человеке и обществе.



Е.С. Романова,

Главный редактор журнала, Директор Института
психологии, социологии и социальных отношений МГПУ,
доктор психологических наук, профессор

 


     Читать полностью...
 

Журнал » Journal_eng » Journal 36 : Contents #36

  Просмотров: 25

CONTENTS

 

Theory and Method of Systems Psychology

 

Ryzhov B. N. The system of motivational oppositions as the basis of psychological individuality (with translation into English)

 

Psychological Researches

 

Romanova E. S., Somova N. G. System research of the life quality in the elderly and old age

Kruglova E. A., Popel N. V. A systematic approach to the study of professional destructions of teacher’s personality

Eskov K. N. Classification of instrumental behavior styles of operators while the homeostat tasks are performing

Filyasova Yu. A. Perfectionist personal construct modelling 

Karpov A. B., Smirnova M. V. Evolution of conceptions of labor motivation Gorbunova I. V. Systems analysis of the main activities groups of directors of schools with various level of productivity 

Gorbunova I. V. Systems analysis of the main activities groups of directors of schools with various level of productivity

 

History of Psychology and Psychology of History

 

Artamonova Е. R., Lobanov Е. V. Systems ideas in the creative heritage of P. P. Blonsky 

Ivanov D. V. Systemic ideas about man struggling in the native psychological thought of the XVI century 

 

Information

 

Authors of the Journal «Systems Psychology and Sociology», 2020, № 4 (36)

Author Guidelines 


     Читать полностью...
 

Журнал » Journal_eng » Journal 36 : D. V. Ivanov, SYSTEMIC IDEAS ABOUT MAN STRUGGLING IN THE NATIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL THOUGHT OF THE XVI CENTURY

  Просмотров: 21

UDC 159.9

DOI 10.25688/2223-6872.2020.36.4.9

 

SYSTEMIC IDEAS ABOUT MAN STRUGGLING IN THE NATIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL THOUGHT OF THE XVI CENTURY

 

D. V. Ivanov,

NSPU, Novosibirsk,

ivanovdirkutsk@yandex.ru

 

Psychological thought about man and his struggle in the XVI century proved to be adequate to the problems of patristic literature. A special place for systemic descriptions of the image of man and his nature is given in such a literary monument as the Great Makariev Chetyas-Minei, named after the most famous collector of them – Metropolitan Makarii of Moscow. Chetyi-Minei represent an extensive set of sources of Russian thought that allow us to understand the features and peculiarities of the development of psychological concepts in a particular historical period of time. 

Based on the patristic heritage, which is important for the study of harmony and the continuity of national psychological thought, an appeal to the human soul, regardless of age; the desire to touch his emotional world theme and images of struggle, which are represented by a particular spiritual experience, which will build its own line of life; orientation on the formation of spiritual and physical potentialities of man; the formation of interest in self-knowledge and self-improvement lie. A spiritual ascetic-fighter, represented in patristic heritage, possesses the will, is capable of fighting, which allows to assess his character.

The ascetic is characterized by an intrapersonal struggle, which helps to prepare him for the development of spiritual capabilities, to reach the top of the ascent on the way to the prototype. His struggle is also defined as socializing in its function, helping to form a social ideal of action. A growing person, as he develops the ability to fight, discovers the activity of his soul. Throughout the whole course of life, the potencies of the struggling human soul are formed. The idea of struggle and the image of man struggling are developed systemically, in the relationship of their manifestations, form a single whole in their perception, understanding and further description.

 

Key words: system representations; original patristic literature; struggle; ascetic; struggling man.

For citation: Ivanov D. V. Systemic ideas about man struggling in the native psychological thought of the XVI century // Systems Psychology and Sociology. 2020. № 4 (36). P. DOI 10.25688/2223-6872.2020.36.4.9.

 

Ivanov Denis Vasilievich, PhD in Pedagogical Sciences. Associate Professor at the Department of General Psychology and History of Psychology of the Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russia.

E-mail: ivanovdirkutsk@yandex.ru

ORCID: 0000-0002-2478-1468


     Читать полностью...
 

Журнал » Journal_eng » Journal 36 : Е. R. Artamonova, Е. V. Lobanov, SYSTEM IDEAS IN THE CREATIVE HERITAGE OF P. P. BLONSKY

  Просмотров: 24

UDC 159.9

DOI 10.25688/2223-6872.2020.36.4.8

 

SYSTEM IDEAS IN THE CREATIVE HERITAGE OF P. P. BLONSKY

 

Е. R. Artamonova, 

VSU, Vladimir,

art1960.2@yandex.ru,

 

Е. V. Lobanov, 

MSUMD, Moscow,

lobanov.evg@inbox.ru

 

The article analyzes the contribution of P. P. Blonsky to the development of systems ideas of psychological science. The article describes the actual problems of developmental and educational psychology, which are reflected in the fundamental works of the author. The dialectical-materialistic approach used by him to the solution of the main methodological problems of psychology is considered. The conceptual model of solving the problem of mental development of a child is covered. A theoretical analysis of a wide range of the problems touched upon by the author is carried out: the study of the question of the importance of childhood, of the historical change in the pace and content of various age stages of human development, the identification of various stages of age development and specific transitions between them, as well as the formulation of the problem of psychological age and the development of a specific historical direction its solutions.

It is noted the presence of innovative ideas in Blonsky's works, which served as the foundation for the emergence of systemic concepts in order to understand the foundations of human mental development. Particular attention in the article is paid to those views of Blonsky on issues of developmental and educational psychology, which retain their scientific and practical interest to the present.

Blonsky's creative heritage gives modern researchers the key to understanding the psychological and pedagogical laws of the formation of the personality. In his works, ideas of psychophysiological unity sound, as well as the need to increase the role of genetic research in considering the mechanisms of age-related development. At the same time, the importance of active involvement in age-appropriate activities is emphasized as a necessary condition for the harmonious development of the child's personality is emphasized. All this testifies to Blonsky's understanding of the need to apply the principle of consistency to the study of mental phenomena.

In Blonsky's works, the ideas of the systemic relationship of mental processes are expressed. He postulates the basic principles of organizing the study of the child. The author's views on the psychological characteristics of teaching and upbringing of difficult schoolchildren, as well as Blonsky's provisions concerning the specifics of the intellectual development of children, are of keen interest.

 

Keywords: P. P. Blonsky; system ideas; pedagogical psychology; age-related psychology; dialectical materialistic approach; activity; patterns of development; game theory; psychological and pedagogical laws.

For citation: Artamonova Е. R., Lobanov Е. V. System ideas in the creative heritage of P. P. Blonsky // Systems Psychology and Sociology. 2020. № 4 (36). P. DOI 10.25688/2223-6872.2020.36.4.8.

 

Artamonova Elena Romanovna, PhD in Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of General and Educational Psychology of the Vladimir State University named after A. G. and N. G. Stoletovs, Vladimir, Russia.

E-mail: art1960.2@yandex.ru

ORCID: 0000-0003-1714-3625

 

Lobanov Evgeniy Valeryevich, postgraduate student at the A. I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia. 

E-mail: lobanov.evg@inbox.ru 

ORCID: 0000-0003-2249-004X


     Читать полностью...
 

Журнал » Journal_eng » Journal 36 : I. V. Gorbunova, SYSTEM ANALYSIS OF ACTIVITY OF THE GENERAL EDUCATION ORGANIZATIONS HEADS

  Просмотров: 19

UDC 159.923

 

DOI 10.25688/2223-6872.2020.36.4.7

 

SYSTEM ANALYSIS OF ACTIVITY OF THE GENERAL EDUCATION ORGANIZATIONS HEADS

 

I. V. Gorbunova,

USPU, Yekaterinburg,

gorbunova-priemnaya@mail.ru

 

System analysis is one of the methods of the system approach used in modern psychology and is the sequence of actions to establish structural links between variables or elements of the system under study, relying on a complex of general scientific, experimental, natural science, statistical, mathematical methods. This reseach uses the system analysis to study the activities of heads of educational organizations. The study was conducted in general education organizations of the city of Perm and the Perm region.

The activities of heads of general education organizations were diagnosed using the Head Teacher Activity Style Questionnaire, the validity and reliability of which has been confirmed many times. Based on the results of diagnostics, the heads of general education organizations, using cluster analysis, were divided into groups depending on the level of success in their professional activities. The characteristics of the activity of each of the selected groups of heads of general education organizations were factorized, which made it possible to establish the features of the structure of the activity of each group.

On the basis of a systematic analysis the features of the structure of the main activities, the relationship of the structural elements of activity and a system function of the individual elements of activities, depending on the level of success of activity of  educational institutions heads are revealed  It has been established that the selected groups of heads of general education organizations differ in the structure of the main areas of activity and the system-forming function of the main areas of activity. The groups of general education organizations heads identified in the study, depending on the level of success, are designated as “strategists”, “tacticians” and “conformists”.

 

Key words: systems analysis; performance indicators; heads of the general education organizations; groups; symptomocoplexes of properties; strategists; tactics; conformists.

For citation: Gorbunova I. V. Systems analysis of activity of the general education organizations heads // Systems Psychology and Sociology. 2020. № 4 (36). P. DOI 10.25688/2223-6872.2020.36.4.7.

 

Gorbunova Irina Viktorovna, Director of the Lyceum №. 9 of Perm, graduate student of the Department of Educational Psychology of the Institute of Psychology of the Ural State Pedagogical University, Yekaterinburg, Russia.

Е-mail: gorbunova-priemnaya@mail.ru

ORCID: 0000-0002-2185-3219


     Читать полностью...
 

Журнал » Journal_eng » Journal 36 : A. B. Karpov, M. V. Smirnova, EVOLUTION OF SYSTEM IDEAS ABOUT LABOR MOTIVATION

  Просмотров: 20

UDC 159.9

DOI 10.25688/2223-6872. 2020.36.4.6

 

EVOLUTION OF SYSTEM IDEAS ABOUT LABOR MOTIVATION

 

A. B. Karpov,

NPF «Materia Medica Holding», Moscow,

karpovab@yandex.ru, 

 

M. V. Smirnova,

NPF «Materia Medica Holding», Moscow,

khokhlovamv@gmail.com

 

The article provides an overview of the most significant theories that have affected the formation of approaches to the study of labor motivation over the past century. The presented review of theories combines both psychological concepts developed by the authors from the position of personality psychology, social and age psychology, and the development of sociologists and economists. A number of these theories are based on abstract ideas about motivation, many of them take as a base large-scale long-term studies of practical aspects of work motivation.

Based on the review of the main principles of each of these theories, a systematic analysis of how the subject of study has changed and how the definition of work motivation has evolved is carried out. According to the results of a summary analysis of the evolution of the concept, the correspondence of the main postulates of the theories to the peculiarities of the historical period in which they were developed:  socio-economic processes, stages of industrial production, and the development of technologies is revealed. There are 4 stages of emergence of labor motivation theories. It is noted that with the completion of the last stage, the focus in the study of labor motivation began to shift to behavioral manifestations of motivation in the organization. The attention of researchers gradually began to switch to the study of employee satisfaction, loyalty and engagement.

One of the key ideas of the article is the conclusion about the need for a systematic approach to the work of a psychologist in an organization, which allows on the one hand  to create the most effective systems that stimulate high productivity, taking as a bases  the development of scientists in the field of labor motivation and on the other hand — using modern methods of assessing engagement, loyalty and satisfaction — to create the system for evaluating and managing behavioral manifestations of employee motivation. The prospects of studying work motivation from the perspective of system psychology are considered.

 

Key words: labor motivation; system approach; system psychology; involvement in work; meaningful theories of motivation; procedural theories of motivation; organizational psychology.

For citation: Karpov A. B., Smirnova M. V. Evolution of system ideas about labor motivation // Systems Psychology and Sociology. 2020. № 4 (36). P. DOI 10.25688/2223-6872.2020.36.4.6.

 

Karpov Alexey Borisovich, PhD in Psychology, Executive Master of Business Administration. Head of organizational development and human resources department of the scientific and production company «Materia Medica Holding», Moscow, Russia. 

E-mail: karpovab@yandex.ru

ORCID: 0000-0001-5437-3265

 

Smirnova Margarita Vyacheslavovna, senior HR manager of the scientific and production company «Materia Medica Holding», Moscow, Russia.

E-mail: khokhlovamv@gmail.com

ORCID: 0000-0003-0671-439X


     Читать полностью...
 

Журнал » Journal_eng » Journal 36 : Yu. A. Filyasova, PERFECTIONIST PERSONAL CONSTRUCT MODELLING

  Просмотров: 24

UDC 159.9

DOI 10.25688/2223-6872. 2020.36.4.05

 

PERFECTIONIST PERSONAL CONSTRUCT MODELLING

 

Yu. A. Filyasova,

SPbUMTE, Saint-Petersburg,

phill.yield@gmail.com

 

The article provides a theoretical analysis of perfectionist personal construct, reasons of its emergence and prevention methods. Perfectionists are characterized by rigid personal constructs, high standards and mirror reflection of their own constructs on other people. Perfectionist constructs restrict the freedom of experience interpretation, reality perception and future events forecasting. 

The main source of perfectionism development is considered to be the family — parental influence on hard line formation, setting high goals, along with the lack of autonomous goal setting skills and awareness of one’s own needs. Construct rigidness occurs as a protective mechanism against negative events and fear of committing errors, under the influence of unfavorable social environment, thus confining the consciousness with perfectionist frames and limiting their adaptation potential. Generalization of a limited number of constructs over various events leads to perfectionist inability to think beyond their own mental shortcuts or successfully adapt to new social conditions. In addition, rigid constructs and strong intention to achieve high goals create fragmentariness and discretization of perception of the ongoing life continuum. The desire to achieve high goals, as a rule, interferes with harmonic personal development.

Depression, procrastination, burnout and other psychological disorders related to perfectionists are caused by their inability to take into consideration their possibilities for achieving high goals. Goal setting skills and the ability to differentiate goals by different criteria, along with awareness and prioritization of needs in the process of education and professionalization are considered in this paper as key factors of negative perfectionist signs elimination.

 

Key words: perfectionism; personal construct; rigidity; procrastination; burnout; goal setting; social alienation.

For citation: Filyasova Yu. A. Perfectionist personal construct modelling // Systems Psychology and Sociology. 2020. № 4 (36). P. DOI 10.25688/2223-6872.2020.36.4.05.

 

Filyasova Yulia Anatolyevna, Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of pedagogy and psychology at St. Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics, St. Petersburg, Russia.

E-mail: phill.yield@gmail.com

ORCID: 0000-0002-9728-9458


     Читать полностью...