B.N. Ryzhov - Sistem psychology
Partners

WWW.SYSTEMPSYCHOLOGY.RU

 

V. A. Medintsev, G. S. Kostiuk QUESTIONS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATION IN THE CONTEXT OF SYSTEMIC DESCRIPTION OF CULTURE

Журнал » Journal_eng » Journal 28 : V. A. Medintsev, G. S. Kostiuk QUESTIONS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATION IN THE CONTEXT OF SYSTEMIC DESCRIPTION OF CULTURE
    Views: 173

QUESTIONS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATION

IN THE CONTEXT OF SYSTEMIC DESCRIPTION OF CULTURE

 

V. A. Medintsev,

G. S. Kostiuk

Institute of Psychology of the National Academy

of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev

 

One of the possible prospects for the development of psychological science is the integration of the knowledge accumulated in it and the creation of a universal methodology for theoretical and experimental studies.

The article briefly outlines the modern scientific context of integration in psychology, emphasizes the its implementation difficulties. The presented methodological positions of G. A. Ball and the author of the article concern with integrative problems and the prospect of the nearest stage of research. It is shown that research on the integrative-personal approach, the cultural function of psychological science and the systemic nature of psychological knowledge can become a theoretical basis for the methodological development of a complex problems of psychological knowledge integrating. The main results are embodied in the developments of: a system of concepts for describing culture as a modi structure and personality as characteristics of a personal psychological modus; theoretical and methodological tools for a formalized description of the interaction of psychological science as a culture modus with its other modi; method of the set-theoretical description for processes (ST-method) and its applications in psychological research. In order to substantiate and develop the concept of psychological knowledge integration on this methodological basis, it is necessary to solve a number of research problems. Among the priorities: to overcome the difficulties on universalization of the representation of scientific-psychological knowledge; to propose a version of the synthesis of the results obtained within the framework of the natural-science and humanitarian paradigms. The main question that must be answered when carrying out these studies is formulated: what methodological tool for a universal description of the objects of psychological research and the presentation of scientific-psychological knowledge may be acceptable to the psychological community.

 

Keywords: natural-science and humanitarian paradigms; psychological science; culture; modus of culture; formalized descriptions in psychology; psychological knowledge integration.

 

For citation: Medintsev V. A. Questions of psychological knowledge integration in the context of systemic description of culture // Systems psychology and sociology. 2018. № 4 (28). P. 14–25.

 

References

 

1. Ball G. A., Medintsev V. A. The set-theoretic method for process description and its application in psychology: monograph. Kiyev: Pedagogical thought, 2016. 88 p.

2. Kozlov V. V. Integrative psychology: the ways of spiritual search, or the sanctification of everyday life. M.: Psychotherapy, 2007. 528 p.

3. Lefebvre V. A. Human Formula: Contours of Fundamental Psychology: Trans. from English. M.: Progress, 1991. 108 p.

4. Mazilov V. A. Integration of psychological knowledge: methodological problems: monograph. Yaroslavl: MAPN, 2008. 112 p.

5. Mazilov V. A. Communicative methodology and integration of psychological knowledge // Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2016. № 3. P. 181–191.

6. Mazilov V. A. Integrative tendencies in the methodology of psychological science // Development of psychology in the system of complex human sciences. Part 1 / ed. by A. L. Zhuravlev, V. A. Koltsov. M.: Institute of Psychology RAS, 2012. P. 90–96.

7. Mazilov V. A. Prospects of the paradigmatic synthesis in modern psychology // Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2013. T. 2. № 3. P. 186–194.

8. Mazilov V. A. Theory and method in psychology. Yaroslavl: MAPN, 1998. 359 p.

9. Medintsev V. A. Subject-dialogical model of the inner space of the person // Voprosy psychologii. 2011. № 3. P. 100–112.

10. Nazaretyan A. P. Single and dissected knowledge in the history of culture (psychology – physics – psychology) // Methodology and history of psychology. 2010. V. 5. Issue 3. P. 38–76.

11. Nestik T. A., Zhuravlev A. L., Yurevich A. V. Forecast of the development of psychological science and practice by 2030 // Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2016. № 5. P. 177–192.

12. Petrenko V. F., Suprun A. P. Interrelation of quantum physics and psychology of consciousness // Psychological journal. 2014. V. 35. № 6. P. 69–86.

13. Ryzhov B. N. System psychology. 2nd ed. M.: T8 Izdatelskiye tekhnologii, 2017. 365 p.

14. Shchedrovitsky G. P. Methodological organization of the psychology sphere // Methodology and history of psychology. 2007. Vol. 2. Issue 3. P. 133–151.

15. Encyclopedia of epistemology and philosophy of science. M.: Canon+ ; ROOI «Rehabilitation», 2009. 1248 p.

16. Yurevich A. V. Paradigmatic debates // Methodology and history of psychology. 2007. V. 2. Issue 3.P. 3–17.

17. Yurevich A. V. Psychology and methodology. M.: Institute of Psychology RAS, 2005. 312 p.

18. Yanchuk V. A. Cultural-dialogical interdeterministic meta-approach to the analysis of psychological phenomenology: theoretical and applied possibilities // Theoretical Research in Psychology. V. 4. 2018. P. 21–82.

19. Yanchuk V. A. Sociocultural and interdeterministic dialogic metatheory of the integration of psychological knowledge in the context of the problem of social progress. Proceedings of the international scientificpractical conference: in 8 parts. / ed. by V. S. Belgorodsky, O. V. Kashcheeva, V. V. Zotova, I. V. Antonenko. Part 1. M.: MOGUDT. 2016. P. 317–324.

20. Yanchuk V. A. Four-dimensional space of comprehension of psychological phenomenology: sociocultural-interdeterministic dialogical perspective. Methodology of modern psychology / ed. by V. V. Kozlov, A. V. Karpov, V. A. Mazilov, V. F. Petrenko. Issue 5 M.-Yaroslavl: YarSU, LKISI RAS, MAPN, 2015, P. 293–312.

21. Cacciopo J. T. The structure of psychology // APS Observer. 2007. № 20. Р. 50–51.

22. Cleeremans A. The grand challenge for psychology: integrate and fire! // Frontiers in Psychology.

22 April 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00012.

23. Spellman B. A. A Short (Personal) Future History of Revolution 2.0 // Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2015. № 10 (6). Р. 886–899.

24. Valsiner J. Integrating Psychology within the Globalizing World: A Requiem to the Post-Modernist Experiment with Wissenschaft // Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. 2009. № 43. Р. 1–21.

25. Wettersten J. Integrating psychology and methodology: how can psychology and methodology be integrated? // Journal for General Philosophy of Science. 1990. № 21. P. 293–308.