SYSTEMS PSYCHOLOGY
AND SOCIOLOGY

    Views: 1029

THE FEATURES OF PERSONAL DETERMINATION AND CORRECTION OF THE AGGRESSIVENESS IN ADOLESCENTS

Е. A Ponomareva,

MCU, Moscow,

D. I. Ponomareva,

T. A. Afonskaya,

MAI, Moscow

This article presents a study of the structure of adolescent impulses to clarify the content of the problems and evaluate the effectiveness of psychological treatment of various forms of teenage aggression. The objectives of the present study were: 1) the identification of incentive determinants of aggressive behavior of teenagers whose parents have repeatedly appealed to the clinical psychologist for advice; 2) analysis of the results on the basis of a projective test of L. Sondhi, as well as methods of «personal aggression and conflict» of E. P. Ilin – P. A. Kovalev — before and after the correction of psychological identity of minors. It is the contents the author’s methodology of training for the formation of a constructive (non-aggressive) behavior and the complex psycho-technical exercises for the correction of behavior in stressful situations. The study suggests that the target group at the significant level expressed by the following models of aggressive behavior: negative due to low self-esteem as a specific form of self-denial (vector «self-concept»); affective (paroxysmal vector). In the course of correctional training the most successfully managed to work through extreme variants of negative sexual and vectors; A positive dynamics of decrease on the scale of «intolerance of the opinions of others», «offensive», «obstinacy», «temper», «negative aggressiveness». It is noted that after the application of psycho methods exposure level in the target group of suspicion, vindictiveness, and totals of positive aggressiveness is not significantly changed. These final psychological diagnosis demonstrate the need to develop and apply additional measures of psychological adjustment for the results obtained. The possibility of using projective techniques L. Sondhi the practical psychologist with difficult teenagers allow a detailed assessment of the current state of the sphere of instincts, and to identify motivation — as a reactive nature, arising in response to the needs and frustrations of a teenager in a social environment, and the endogenous nature of having an internal cause genetic or other source that is not associated with the current situation. Methods of psychological correction impact applied during the study may contribute to the formation of teenagers the skills of effective behavior in difficult situations.

Keywords: adolescents; aggressiveness; aggressive behavior; personal determination; motivation; psychological correction; training; conflict; stress; projective method of L. Sondhi.

For citation: Ponomareva E. A., Ponomareva D. I., Afonskaya T. A. The features of personal determination and correction of the aggressiveness in adolescents // Systems psychology and sociology. 2018. № 1 (25). P. 26–35

References

1. Afonskaya T. A. Resistance to stress as an outcome of taking possible informed decision-making by a person // Modeling of the demographic development and socio-economic efficiency of Russian demographic policy. The proceedings of the international scientific-practical conference. M.: Economic Education, 2015.P. 166–169.

2. Baron R., Richardson D. Aggression: translated from English. SPb.: Peter Press, 2017. 416 p.

3. Ilyin E. P. Psychology of communication and interpersonal relationships. SPb.: Piter, 2017. 592 p.

4. Mozhginsky Yu. B. Aggression in adolescents: emotional and crisis mechanism. SPb.: Lan, 2014. 128 p.

5. Ponomareva D. I., Ponomareva Е. A. Specific features of aggression in young offenders // Proceedings of the IV All-Russian Congress of the RPO. M.; Rostov n/D.: Credo, 2007. P. 62.

6. Ponomareva Е. A., Ponomareva D. I. Study of the socio-psychological characteristics of the organizational culture in the educational systems // Social education: a systematic approach collection of scientific articles / edited A. V. Ivanov. M.: Perspective, 2016. P. 58–65.

7. Rutter М. Helping troubled children: translated from English. М.: IOI, 2017. 431 p.

8. Romanova E. S., Shubin S. B. The psychological impact of computer and console video games on young people // Systems psychology and sociology. 2017. № 1 (21). P. 57–69.

9. Semenuk L. M. Psychological features of aggressive behavior in teenagers and terms of its correction / Moscow Psychological and Social Institute. M.: Flinta, 2014. 96 p.

10. Szondi L. Experimental diagnostics of drives: textbook: translated from German. M.: Cogito-Center,2005. 557 p.

11. Sobchik L. N. The method of portrait selections — the Szondi test. SPb.: Rech, 2013. 125 p.

12. Atherton O. E., Tackett J. L., Ferrer E., Robins R. W. Bidirectional pathways between relational aggression and temperament from late childhood to adolescence // Journal of Research in Personality.  April 2017. Vol. 67. P. 75–84. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.04.005.

13. Bethune S. Teen stress rivals that of adults // Monitor on Psychology. April 2014. Vol. 45. № 4. P. 20. URL: http://www.apa.org/monitor/2014/04/teen-stress.aspx.

14. Chung J. M., Hutteman R., Aken Marcel A. G. , Denissen J. A. High, low, and in between: Self-esteem development from middle childhood to young adulthood // Journal of Research in Personality. October 2017. Vol. 70. P. 122–133. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.07.001.

15. Clay Z., Ravaux L., Waal Frans B. M., Zuberbühler K. Bonobos (Pan paniscus) Vocally Protest Against Violations of Social Expectations // Journal of Comparative Psychology. 2016. Vol. 130. № 1. P. 44–54. URL: http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/features/com-coma0040088.pdf.

16. Konold T., Cornell D., Huang F., Meyer P., Lacey A., Nekvasil E., Shukla K. Multilevel multiinformant structure of the authoritative school climate survey// School Psychology Quarterly. Sept. 2014.Vol. 29. P. 238–255. URL: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/spq0000062.

17. Nekvasil E. K., Cornell D. G. Student threat assessment associated with safety in middle schools // Journal of Threat Assessment and Management. 2015. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 98–113. URL: http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/features/tam-tam0000038.pdf.

18. Nielsen L. Re-examining the Research on Parental Conflict, Coparenting, and Custody Arrangements // Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2017. Vol. 23. № 2. P. 211–231. URL: http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/features/law-law0000109.pdf.

19. Shilpi P. Behavioral therapy for children with emotional disorders // SOJ Psychology. 2017. № 4 (2). P. 1–2. URL: https://symbiosisonlinepublishing.com/ psychology/ psychology41.pdf.

20. Shiner Rebecca L., Allen Timothy A., Masten Ann S. Adversity in adolescence predicts personality trait change from childhood to adulthood // Journal of Research in Personality. April 2017. Vol. 67. P. 171–182. URL: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.10.002.

21. Tucker C. J., Van Gundy Karen T., Wiesen-Martin D., Sharp Erin H., Rebellon Cesar J., Stracuzzi Nena F. Proactive and reactive sibling aggression and adjustment in adolescence // Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Vol. 30. Issue 6. P. 965–987. URL: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0886260514539760.

22. Yalcin O., Erdogan A. Neurobiological, psychosocial and environmental causes of violence and aggression // Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar. 2013. № 5 (4). P. 388–419. DOI 10.5455/cap.20130526.URL: https: // doaj.org/article/ 6540147ec0fa4d55b9659a9047cf3481.