Ryzhov B. N. The system of motivational oppositions as the basis of psychological individuality

Preuss F., Perevozkina Yu. M. Interconnection and types of social relations of role socialization system formation: metasystem approach

Ryzhov B. N. The actual-self, ideal-self and hidden-self (with Translation into English by L. A. Mashkova)

Ryzhov B. N., Tarasova А. А. Emotional Perception of Architectural Objects of 1920–1930s by Moscow Students (with Translation into English by L. A. Mashkova)

Kondratyev V. M. The Problem of Balance between Morality and Law in Human Education (with a Translation into English)

Ryzhov B. N. Psychological Age of Civilization (translated into English by L. A. Mashkova)

Aleksander T. A Review about Old Age and Disability (translated into English by A. Diniejko and into Russian by О. Leszczak)

A. A. Zych Silver University as an alternative for the polish solutions

B. N. Ryzhov THE PSYCHOLOGICAL AGE OF CIVILIZATION: the XV century, the North Renaissance

Yu. M. Perevozkina, V. G. Fedosov, F. Prusse Functional organization of impasa-role socialization of youth: metasystemic approach

T. Macho, I. V. Lebedeva, M. M. Bicharova. Migration in Europe as systemic phenomenon of the contemporary society

G. Gross, J. S. Frolova From London to Moscow coronations: perceptions of monarchy

Simons G. Tangible threats through intangible means: aspects of BRICS information and communication security

Ryzhov B. N., Mashkova L. A., Stolyarova G. I. Dynamics of motivational indicators in high school

B.N. Ryzhov - Sistem psychology




    Views: 240

UDC 159.9

DOI 10.25688/2223-6872.2020.34.2.05




T. V. Ledovskaya,

YSPU, Yaroslavl,


N. E. Solynin,

YSPU, Yaroslavl,



The article substantiates the relevance of the studied problem due to the fact that in science mainly ana­lytical approaches to the study of communicative abilities are implemented. In the study the authors applied a systematic approach laid down by V. D. Shadrikov. The results of the development of a theoretical model of the psychological structure of communicative abilities (PSCA) are presented. It is shown that PSCA has the following components: General abilities (learning ability), personal characteristics (Self-concept, empathy, sociability), and communication skills. Selected and tested psychodiagnostic techniques that allow you to study the individual psychological qualities included in the structure. The empirical study was carried out in groups of students of a pedagogical University. The sample size is 87 people.

Component and structural analysis of communicative abilities of students of pedagogical higher education is carried out. It is established that the psychological structure of communicative abilities is a complete psycho­logical structure of individual psychological qualities that have relationships. The largest number of connections is present between the block of communication skills and the block of personal characteristics, which means that the level of development of sociability, empathy and self-esteem depends on the development of communication skills and abilities, as well as the choice of position in communication.

The internal frame structure, which is the basis for the development and compensation of other quali­ties that make up communicative skills (factor knowledge of the conduct), communication skills (competent position to communicate); empathy (the emotional channel of empathy, installation, promote empathy); so­ciability (arginate, stanchest, internality, externality, sociocentricity, comprehension). A comparative analysis of the psychological structure of communicative abilities in students of different training profiles is carried out and its structural and component differences are established.


Keywords: abilities; communicative capacity; students; pedagogical university; communicative compe­tence; structure; communicative skills.

For citation: Ledovskaya T. V., Solynin N. E. Psychological structure of communicative abili­ties in pedagogical university students // Systems Psychology and Sociology. 2020. № 2 (34). P. 59-68.

DOI: 10.25688/2223-6872.2020.34.2.05


Ledovskaya Tatyana Vitalevna, PhD in Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Pro­fessor at the Department of Pedagogical Psychology of the Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky, Yaroslavl, Russia.

E-mail: karmennnn@yandex.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3134-1436


Solynin Nikita Eduardovich, PhD in Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Pedagogical Psychology of the Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky, Yaroslavl, Russia.

E-mail: SoNik7-39@yandex.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6896-0479




1. Askerova G. G. К. Vzaimosvyaz' kommunikativny'x, organizatorskix sposobnostej i trevozhnosti lichnosti u yunoshej i devushek [The relationship of communication, organizational skills and personality anxiety in boys and girls] // Bulletin of the Saratov Regional Institute of Education Development. 2015. № 3. P. 72-77. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24296998

2. Babenko Yu. А., Derevyanko Yu. P. Osobennosti kommunikativny'x sposobnostej u studentov s raz-ny'm urovnem e'mpatii [Features of communicative abilities in students with different level of empathy] // Science and education: new time. 2019. № 1 (30). P. 563-568. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37106422

3. Konokpaeva I. S., Ermolaeva А. Yu. Kommunikativny'e i organizatorskie sposobnosti u studentov pedvuza [Communication and organizational skills in students of pedagogical higher school] // Bulletin of the In­ternational student scientific Bulletin. 2016. № 5-1. P. 123-124. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26142909

4. Lidskaya E. V. Kommunikativny'e sposobnosti starsheklassnikov v kontekste sub''ekt-sredovy'x vzaimodejstvij [Communicative abilities of High school students in the context of subject-environment inter­actions] // Bulletin of the Samara academy for the humanities. Series: Psychology. 2019. № 1 (25). P. 82-94. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41359539

5. Prikhodko О. V., Khvashchevskaya D. I. Issledovanie kommunikativny'x sposobnostej studen­tov — budushhix pedagogov [Investigation of communicative competence of future teacherspsychologists] // Pedagogics of modernity. 2015. № 2 (6). P. 26-30. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25023478

6. Sapegina Т. А. Pedagogicheskie aspekty' formirovaniya kommunikativny'x sposobnostej u studentov pedagogicheskix vuzov [Pedagogical aspects of communicative abilities formation in students of pedagogical universities] // Concept. 2016. № T15. С. 366-370. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25917944

7. Smirnova P. Yu., Morova N. S. Formirovanie kommunikativny'x sposobnostej v yunosheskom voz-raste [The formation of communicative abilities in young people] // Pedagogical experience: theory, technique, practice. 2016. № 2 (7). С. 53-55. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26100248

8. Takhokhov B. А., Sikoeva М. Т. Sovershenstvovanie kommunikativny'x sposobnostej studen-tov-psixologov [Improvement of communication skills in students of psychology] // Bulletin of the North Ossetian state University named after K. L. Khetagurov. 2015. № 3. P. 147-151. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.


9. Shadrikov V. D. Sposobnosti i odarennost' cheloveka [Abilities and talent in human: monography]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAN, 2019. 274 p.

10. Shutova N. V., Khodikina О. А. Osobennosti razvitiya kommunikativny'x i e'mpatijny'x sposobnostej studentov kak komponentov kommunikativnoj kul'tury' [Peculiarities of development of students' communi-vative and empathic abilities as components of communicative culture] // Current problems and prospects of development of modern psychology. 2016. № 1. P. 115-120. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28184142

11. Agostino A. Understanding ironic criticism and empathic praise: The role of emotive communica­tion / A. Agostino et al. // British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2017. Vol. 35. Issue 2. P. 186-201. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12155

12. Anikeyeva J. V., Lozhechkina A. D. Psychological determinants of communication abilities of univer­sity students within the framework of implementation of the federal state educational standards // Психология образования в поликультурном пространстве. 2017. № 39 (3). С. 8-16. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.as-p?id=30014626

13. Dhondt A. Communicative abilities in young children with a signiicant cognitive and motor deve­lopmental delay / A. Dhondt et al. // Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 2020. № 3 (33). P. 529-541. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jar. 12695

14. Evans K. S. Explicating Affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in com­munication research / K. S. Evans et al. // Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 2017. Vol. 22. Issue 1. P. 35-52. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180

15. Kittelman S., Calvo Amodio J., Martinez Leon H. C. A Systems Analysis of Communication: Defining the Nature of and Principles for Communication Within Human Activity Systems // Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 2018. Vol. 35, Issue 5. P. 520-537. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2562

16. Lou N. M., Mantou N., Noels K. A. Breaking the vicious cycle of language anxiety: Growth language mindsets improve lower-competence ESL students' social experiences // Contemporary Educational Psychology (In press). 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101847

17. Ma L. I am one of them: Examining crisis communication from an intergroup communication ap­proach // Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. 2019. Vol. 27. Issue 1. P. 50-60. URL: https://doi. org/10.1111/1468-5973.12232

18. Nilsen E. S., Bacso S. A. Cognitive and behavioural predictors of adolescents' communicative per­spective-taking and social relationships // Journal of Adolescence. 2017. Vol. 56. P. 52-63. URL: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.01.004

19. Rothenberger L. T., Auer C., Pratt C. B. Theoretical approaches to normativity in communication research // Communication Theory. 2017. Vol. 27. Issue 2. P. 176-201. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12103

20. Taljaard A., de Beer E. Integrative communication for organisational sustainability — An integra-tive communication relationship model as communication management tool // Journal of Public Affairs. 2019. Vol. 19. Issue 4. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1957

21. Uzundag B. A., Kiintay A. C. Children's referential communication skills: The role of cognitive abilities and adult models of speech // Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2018. Vol. 172. P. 73-95. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.02.009