СИСТЕМНАЯ ПСИХОЛОГИЯ
И СОЦИОЛОГИЯ

    Просмотров: 75

UDC 159.9

DOI 10.25688/2223-6872.2024.50.2.7

ВЗАИМОСВЯЗЬ МЕЖДУ ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕМ СОЦИАЛЬНЫХ СЕТЕЙ И ПСИХИЧЕСКИМ ЗДОРОВЬЕМ ПОДРОСТКОВ: СИСТЕМАТИЧЕСКИЙ ОБЗОР

М. Д. Якуб,

Медицинский университет Биньчжоу,

Яньтай, Китайская Народная Республика,

danish@stu.bzmc.edu.cn,

У. Чо,

Больница королевы Елизаветы,

Гонконг, Китайская Народная Республика,

williamcscho@gmail.com

К. Салим,

Даляньский технологический университет,

Далянь, Китайская Народная Республика,

s.kiran@mail.dlut.edu.cn,

К. Анджум,

Университет менеджмента и технологий,

Лахор, Пакистан,

kaiynat2001@gmail.com,

М. Доу,

Шаньдунский профессионально-технический

университет международных исследований,

Жичжао, Китайская Народная Республика,

3047885483@qq.com,

С. Фэн,

Шаньдунский университет традиционной китайской медицины,

Цзинань, Китайская Народная Республика,

fengxiyu0630@126.com,

Х. Чаттха,

Кампус школьной системы Beaconhouse для девочек,

Лахор, Пакистан,

hajrax19@gmail.com

В последние годы использование социальных сетей подростками и молодыми людьми значительно расширилось, и это привело к значительному росту проблем с психическим здоровьем и благополучием среди подростков и молодых взрослых. Несмотря на то что социальные сети обвиняют в росте проблем с психическим здоровьем среди подростков и молодых взрослых, они по-прежнему вызывают споры. В этом обзоре предпринята попытка обобщить имеющуюся информацию о связи между (1) интенсивным и проблемным использованием социальных сетей, (2) активным и пассивным использованием и (3) социальным сравнением и психическим здоровьем и благополучием подростков и молодых людей. Обзор литературы проводится и публикуется в соответствии с рекомендациями по предпочтительным статьям отчетности для систематических обзоров и метаанализа (PRISMA). Систематический поиск публикаций осуществляется в шести базах данных в период с 2017 по 2022 год. Включение статей ограничено взаимосвязью между следующими типами использования социальных сетей: (1) интенсивным и проблемным использованием, (2) активным и пассивным использованием и (3) социальным  сравнением и психическим здоровьем и благополучием подростков и молодых людей в возрасте от 10 до 24 лет и рецензируемая публикация на английском языке. Поиск выявил 13 статей, в том числе 11 поперечных исследований, 1 лонгитюдное исследование и 1 экспериментальное исследование. Интенсивное использование социальных сетей по-прежнему не оказывает негативного влияния на психическое здоровье и благополучие подростков, однако проблемное использование социальных сетей негативно сказывается на психическом здоровье и благополучии подростков. Основной переменной в отрицательной связи между активным использованием социальных сетей и психическим здоровьем подростков было время, проведенное в социальных сетях. Что касается связи между пассивным использованием социальных сетей и психическим здоровьем подростков и молодых людей, то обнаружено сдерживающее воздействие первоначального настроения и оптимизма и опосредующий эффект зависти, вызванной социальными сетями. Благодаря тому, что социальное сравнение является посредником между тенденцией к социальному сравнению и восходящим социальным сравнением, а также модератором результатов социального сравнения и самоэффективности, социальное сравнение является важнейшим механизмом пассивного использования социальных сетей, а также обеспечения благополучия подростков и их психического здоровья. Связь между использованием социальных сетей и психическим здоровьем и благополучием подростков и молодых людей весьма сложна. На эти взаимосвязи влияют индивидуальные особенности человека, воздействие окружающей среды и другие сопутствующие факторы.

Литература

1. Active and passive social media use and symptoms of anxiety and depressed mood among Icelandic adolescents / I. E. Thorisdottir et al. // Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2019. Vol. 22. № 8. P. 535–542. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0079

2. Adolescents’ intense and problematic social media use and their well-being in 29 countries / M. Boer et al. // Journal of Adolescent Health. 2020. № 6S (66). P. S89 – S99. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.02.014

3. Aichner T., Jacob F. Measuring the degree of corporate social media use // International Journal of Market Research. 2015. Vol. 57. № 2. P. 257–276. DOI: 10.2501/ijmr-2015-018

4. Anderson E. L., Steen E., Stavropoulos V. Internet use and problematic Internet use: a systematic review of longitudinal research trends in adolescence and emergent adulthood // International Journal of Adolescence and Youth. 2017. Vol. 22. № 4. P. 430–454. DOI: 10.1080/02673843.2016.1227716

5. Anderson M., Jiang J. Teens’ social media habits and experiences // Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. 2018. URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/11/28/teens-social-media-habits-and-experiences/ (date of access: 12.08.2022).

6. A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools / P. Whiting et al. // Systematic Reviews. 2017. № 1 (6). P. 204. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0604-6

7. Aromataris E., Munn Z. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. Refined site. 2020. URL: https://synthesismanual. jbi.global .

8. Association between passive social media use and well-being among adolescents and young adults: a systematic review / L. Y. Lin et al. // JAMA Pediatrics. 2021. № 2 (175). P. 192–201. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics. 2020.5303

9. A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches / W. M. Bramer et al. // Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2018. № 4 (106). P. 531–541. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2018.283

10. Baker K. A., Weeks S. M. An overview of systematic review // Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing. 2014. № 6 (29). P. 454–458. DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2014.07.002

11. Bayer J. B., Triệu P., Ellison N. B. Social media elements, ecologies, and effects // Annual Review of Psychology. 2020. № 1 (71). P. 471–497. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050944

12. Beers L. S., Tu K. M., Kandalaft M. R. An examination of the associations between social media use and mental health outcomes in adults // Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 2020. № 11 (41). P. 961–967. DOI: 10.1080/01612840.2020.1730491

13. Bergagna E., Tartaglia S. Self-esteem, social comparison, and Facebook** use // Europe’s Journal of Psychology. 2018. № 4 (14). P. 831–845. DOI: 10.5964/ejop.v14i4.1592

14. Best P., Manktelow R., Taylor B. Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: a systematic narrative review // Children and Youth Services Review. 2014. № 41. P. 27–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.001

15. Blakemore S.-J., Mills K. L. Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing? // Annual Review of Psychology. 2014. № 1 (65). P. 187–207. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115202

16. Boer M., Stevens G. W. J. M., Finkenauer C., van den Eijnden R. J. J. M. The complex association between social media use intensity and adolescent wellbeing: a longitudinal investigation of five factors that May affect the association // Computers in Human Behavior. 2022. № 128. P. 107084. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107084

17. Brandenberg G., Ozimek P., Bierhoff H.-W., Janker C. The relation between use intensity of private and professional SNS, social comparison, self-esteem, and depressive tendencies in the light of self-regulation // Behaviour Information Technology. 2018. № 6 (38). P. 578–591. DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1545049

18. Burnell K., George M. J., Underwood M. K. Browsing different Instagram profiles and associations with psychological well-being // Frontiers in Human Dynamics. 2020. № 2. P. 585518. DOI: 10.3389/fhumd.2020.585518

19. Buunk A. P., Gibbons F. X. Social comparison: the end of a theory and the emergence of a field //Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2007. № 1 (102). P. 3–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.007

20. Children and parents: media use and attitudes report // Ofcom. 2022. URL: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/234609/childrens-media-use-and-attitudes-report-2022.pdf (date of access: 12.08.2022).

21. Cooke A., Smith D., Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis // Qualitative Health Research. 2012. № 10 (22). P. 1435–1443. DOI: 10.1177/1049732312452938

22. Does time spent using social media impact mental health? An eight year longitudinal study / S. M. Coyne et al. // Computers in Human Behavior. 2019. № 104. P. 106160. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb2017z.2019.106160

23. Critical appraisal tools // Joanna Briggs Institute. 2020. URL: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools

24. Crone E. A., Konijn E. A. Media use and brain development during adolescence // Nature Communications. 2018. Vol. 9. № 1. P. 588. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03126-x

25. Crusius J., Gonzalez M. F., Lange J., Cohen-Charash Y. Envy: an adversarial review and comparison of two competing views // Emotion Review. № 12 (12). 2019. P. 3–21. DOI: 10.1177/1754073919873131

26. Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: a living systematic review / L. Schmidt et al. // F1000Research. 2021. № 10. P. 401. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.51117.21

27. Do others’ self-presentation on social media influence individual’s subjective well-being? A moderated mediation model / X. Fan et al. // Telematics and Informatics. 2019. № 6 (41). P. 86–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2019.04.001

28. Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review / P. Verduynet al. // Social Issues and Policy Review. 2017. Vol. 11. № 1. P. 274–302. DOI: 10.1111/sipr.12033

29. Eijnden van den R. J. J. M., Lemmens J. S., Valkenburg P. M. The social media disorder scale // Computers in Human Behavior. 2016. № 61. P. 478–487. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.038

30. Elhai J. D., Levine J. C., Hall B. J. The relationship between anxiety symptom severity and problematic smartphone use: a review of the literature and conceptual frameworks // Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2019. № 62. P. 45–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.11.005

31. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care / R. Campbell et al. // Social Science & Medicine. 2003. № 4 (56). P. 671–684. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00064-3

32. Feltman C. E., Szymanski D. M. Instagram** use and self-objectification: the roles of internalization, comparison, appearance commentary, and feminism // Sex Roles. 2017. № 5–6 (78). P. 311–324. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-017-0796-1

33. Frison E., Eggermont S. Exploring the relationships between different types of Facebook** use, perceived online social support, and adolescents’ depressed mood // Social Science Computer Review. 2015. № 2 (34). P. 153–171. DOI: 10.1177/0894439314567449

34. Gerber J. P., Wheeler L., Suls J. A social comparison theory meta-analysis 60+ years on // Psychological Bulletin. 2018. № 2 (144). P. 177–197. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000127

35. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews a product from the ESRC methods programme / J. Popay et al. London: PublisherInstitute for Health Research, 2006. 92 p.

36. International perspectives on social media use among adolescents: Implications for mental and social well-being and substance use / M. Boniel-Nissim et al. // Computers in Human Behavior. 2021. № 129. P. 107144. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107144

37. Ivie E. J., Pettitt A., Moses L. J., Allen N. B. A meta-analysis of the association between adolescent social media use and depressive symptoms // Journal of Affective Disorders. 2020. № 275. P. 165–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadz2020.06.014

38. Keles B., McCrae N., Grealish A. A systematic review: the influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents // International Journal of Adolescence and Youth. 2020. № 1 (25). P. 79–93. DOI: 10.1080/02673843.2019.1590851

39. Kelly Y., Zilanawala A., Booker C., Sacker A. Social media use and adolescent mental health:findings from the UK Millennium cohort study // EClinicalMedicine. 2019. Vol. 6. P. 59–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.12.005

40. Kemp S. The global state of digital in July 2022 // DataReportal. Global Digital Insights. 2022. URL: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-july-global-statshot (date of access: 12.08.2022).

41. Killick C., Taylor B. J. Professional decision making on elder abuse: systematic narrative review // Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect. 2009. № 3 (21). P. 211–238. URL: https://pure.ulster.ac.uk/en/publications/professional-decision-making-on-elder-abuse-systematic-narrative--3 (date of access: 16.08.2022).

42. Kim H. H. The impact of online social networking on adolescent psychological well-being (WB): a population-level analysis of Korean school-aged children // International Journal of Adolescence and Youth. 2017. № 3 (22). P. 364–376. DOI: 10.1080/02673843.2016.1197135

43. Kircaburun K., Griffiths M. D., Billieux J. Childhood emotional maltreatment and problematic social media use among adolescents: The the mediating role of body image dissatisfaction // International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2020. № 18. P. 1536–1547. DOI: 10.1007/s11469-019-0054-6

44. Lasota M. Growing up in a digital world: benefits and risks // UNICEF Global Development Commons. 2018. URL: https://gdc.unicef.org/resource/growing-digital-world-benefits-and-risks (date of access: 12.08.2022).

45. Li Y. Upward social comparison and depression in social network settings settings // Internet Research. 2019. № 1 (29). P. 46–59. DOI: 10.1108/intr-09-2017-0358

46. Lin S., Liu D., Niu G., Longobardi C. Active social network sites use and loneliness: the mediating role of social support and self-esteem // Current Psychology. 2020. № 4 (41). DOI: 10.1007/s12144-020-00658-8

47. Liu Q., Niu G., Fan C., Zhou Z. Passive use of social network site and its relationships with self-esteem and self-concept clarity: a moderated mediation analysis // Acta Psychologica Sinica. 2017. № 1 (49). P. 60. DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1041.2017.00060

48. MacDonald G. Using systematic reviews to improve social care. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence, 2003. 33 p. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Using-Systematic-Reviews-to-Improve-Social-Care-MacDonald/6d8514ee6a876588a8d54ba14a4a33aacd88d4a6 (date of access: 16.08. 2022).

49. Marino C., Gini G., Vieno A., Spada M. M. The associations between problematic Facebook** use, psychological distress and well-being among adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Journal of Affective Disorders. 2018. № 226. P. 274–281. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.007

50. McFadden P., Taylor B. J., Campbell A., McQuilkin J. Systematically identifying relevant research / Research on Social Work Practice. 2012. № 6 (22). P. 626–636. DOI: 10.1177/1049731512453209

51. Meier A., Gilbert A., Börner S., Possler D. Instagram** inspiration: how upward comparison on social network sites can contribute to well-being // Journal of Communication. 2020. № 5 (70). P. 721–743. DOI: 10.1093/joc/jqaa025

52. Meier A., Johnson B. K. Social comparison and envy on social media: a critical review // Current Opinion in Psychology. 2022. № 45. P. 101302. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101302

53. Meier A., Schäfer S. The positive side of social comparison on social network sites: how envy can drive inspiration on Instagram** // Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2018. № 7 (21). P. 411–417. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0708

54. Myers T. A., Crowther J. H. Social comparison as a predictor of body dissatisfaction: a meta-analytic review // Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2009. № № 4 (118). P. 683–698. DOI: 10.1037/a0016763

55. Nesi J. The impact of social media on youth mental health: challenges and opportunities // North Carolina Medical Journal. 2020. Vol. 81. № 2. P. 116–121. DOI: 10.18043/ncm.81.2.116

56. Noon E. J., Meier A. Inspired by friends: adolescents’ network homophily moderates the relationship between social comparison, envy, and inspiration on Instagram** // Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2019. № 12 (22). P. 787–793. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0412

57. Nowland R., Necka E. A., Cacioppo J. T. Loneliness and social Internet use: pathways to reconnection in a digital world? // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2018. № 2 (13). P. 174569161771305. DOI: 10.1177/1745691617713052

58. Orben A., Dienlin T., Przybylski A. K. Social media’s enduring effect on adolescent life satisfaction // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019. № 21 (116). P. 201902058. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1902058116

59. Orben A., Przybylski A. K., Blakemore S.-J., Kievit R. A. Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media // Nature Communications. 2022. № 1 (13). P. 1649. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29296-3

60. Owens J. K. Systematic reviews: brief overview of methods, limitations, and resources // Nurse Author & Editor. 2021. № 3–4 (31). P. 69–72. DOI: 10.1111/nae2.28

61. Park S. Y., Baek Y. M. Two faces of social comparison on Facebook**: the interplay between social comparison orientation, emotions, and psychological well-being // Computers in Human Behavior. 2018. № 79. P. 83–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.028

62. Personality traits, interpersonal relationships, online social support, and Facebook addiction / J.-H. Tang et al. // Telematics and Informatics. 2016. № 1 (33). P. 102–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.003

63. Pfeifer J. H., Allen N. B. Puberty initiates cascading relationships between neurodevelopmental, social, and internalizing processes across adolescence // Biological Psychiatry. 2020. № 2 (89). DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.09.002

64. Prevalence and risk factors for diabetes mellitus in Nigeria: a systematic review and meta-analysis / A. E. Uloko et al. // Diabetes Therapy. 2018. № 3 (9). P. 1307–1316. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-018-0441-1

65. Primack B. A., Escobar-Viera C. G. Social media as it interfaces with psychosocial development and mental illness in transitional age youth // Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 2017. № 2 (26). P. 217–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.chc.2016.12.007

66. Problematic social media use and health among adolescents / L. Paakkari et al. // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021. № 4 (18). P. 1885. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041885

67. Problematic social media use: results from a large-scale nationally representative adolescent sample / F. Banyai et al. // PLoS One. 2017. № 1 (12). e0169839. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169839

68. Radovic A., Gmelin T., Stein B. D., Miller E. Depressed adolescents’ positive and negative use of social media // Journal of Adolescence. 2017. № 55 (55). P. 5–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.12.002

69. Reinecke L., Trepte S. Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: a two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication // Computers in Human Behavior. 2014. № 30. P. 95–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030

70. Roles of cyberbullying, sleep, and physical activity in mediating the effects of social media use on mental health and wellbeing among young people in England: a secondary analysis of longitudinal data / R. M. Viner et al. // The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 2019. № 3 (10). P. 685–696. DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(19)30186-5

71. Sharifians N., Zaheed A. B., Zahodne L. B. The role of envy in linking active and passive social media use to memory functioning // Psychology of Popular Media Culture. 20212022. № 1 (11). P. 80–89. DOI: 10.1037/ppm0000318

72. Shaw A. M., Timpano K. R., Tran T. B., Joormann J. Correlates of Facebook** usage patterns: The relationship between passive Facebook** use, social anxiety symptoms, and brooding. // Computers in Human Behavior. 2015. № 48. P. 575–580. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.003

73. Social comparison on social networking sites / P. Verduyn et al. // Current Opinion in Psychology. 2020. Vol. 36. P. 32–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.002

74. Social media and well-being: pitfalls, progress, and next steps / E. Kross et al. // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2021. № 1 (25). P. 55–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.005

75. Social media browsing and adolescent well-being: challenging the “passive social media use hypothesis” / P. Valkenburg et al. // Europe PMC Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2022. № 1 (27). DOI: 10.1093/jcmc/zmab0152021

76. Social media use intensity, social media use problems, and mental health among adolescents: investigating directionality and mediating processes / M. Boer et al. // Computers in Human Behavior. 2021. № 116. P. 106645. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106645

77. Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare / M. J. Taylor et al. // BMJ Quality & Safety. 2014. Vol. 23. № 4. P. 290–298. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001862

78. Tartaglia S., Bergagna E. Social networking sites passive use and its effects on sad-happy mood // Psihologija. 2022. № 2 (55). P. 137–147. URL: http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/Article.aspx?ID=0048-57052100008T#. Yww0j3bMK3A (date of access: 29.08.2022]).

79. Testing methodological guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews / M. Rodgers et al. // Evaluation. 2009. № 15 (15). P. 49–73. DOI: 10.1177/1356389008097871

80. The dark side of Internet use: two longitudinal studies of excessive Internet use, depressive symptoms, school burnout and engagement among finnish early and late adolescents / K. Salmela-Aro et al. // Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2016. № 2 (46). P. 343–357. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-016-0494-2

81. The impact of Internet and social media use on well-being: a longitudinal analysis of adolescents across nine years / C. Schemer et al. // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2021. № 1 (26). P. 1–21. DOI: 10.1093/jcmc/zmaa014

82. The relationship between Instagram use and indicators of mental health: a systematic review / L. Faelens et al. // Computers in Human Behavior Reports. 2021. № 4. P. 100121. DOI: 10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100121

83. Chadee D. Theories in Social Psychology / edited by D. Chadee. John Wiley & Sons, 2022. 320 p. URL: https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=zh-CN&lr=&id=y8Z6EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA165&dq=assimilation+contrast+social+comparison&ots=wdWX3lhhlS&sig=yf-j5kRD9DmKx8NZQH-9d2Zc4wjQ#v=onepage&q=assimilation%20contrast%20social%20comparison&f=false (date of access:19.08. 2022).

84. Torgerson D. J., Torgerson C. J. Designing randomised trials in health, education and the social sciences: an introduction. Springer, 2008. 209 p. URL: https://books.google.co.uk/books?lr=&id=3leHDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Torgerson+D (date of access: 24.08. 2022).

85. Tosun L. P., Kaşdarma E. Passive Facebook** use and depression: a study of the roles of upward comparisons, emotions, and friendship type // Journal of Media Psychology. 2019. № 2 (32). P. 1–11. DOI: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000269

86. Trifiro B. M., Gerson J. Social media usage patterns: research note regarding the lack of universal validated measures for active and passive use // Social Media + Society. 2019. № 2 (5). P. 205630511984874. DOI: 10.1177/2056305119848743

87. Trub L., Rosenthal L. Instagram** #Instasad?: exploring associations among Instagram** use, depressive symptoms, negative social comparison, and strangers followed // Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2012. № 5 (18). P. 247–252. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0560

88. Twenge J. M., Martin G. N., Campbell W. K. Decreases in psychological well-being among American adolescents after 2012 and links to screen time during the rise of smartphone technology // Emotion. 2018. № 6 (18). P. 765–780. DOI: 10.1037/emo0000403

89. Underwood M. K., Ehrenreich S. E. The power and the pain of adolescents’ digital communication: Cyber victimization and the perils of lurking // American Psychologist. 2017. № 2 (72). P. 144–158. DOI: 10.1037/a0040429

90. Vannucci A., McCauley Ohannessian C. Social media use subgroups differentially predict psychosocial well-being during early adolescence // Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2019. № 8 (48). P. 1469–1493. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-019-01060-9

91. Vogels E. A., Gelles-Watnick R., Massarat N. Teens, social media and technology // Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. 2022. URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/08/10/teens-social-media-and-technology-2022/ (date of access: 12.08.2022).

92. Wang J.-L., Wang H.-Z., Gaskin J., Hawk S. The mediating roles of upward social comparison and self-esteem and the moderating role of social comparison orientation in the association between social networking site usage and subjective well-being // Frontiers in Psychology. 2017. № 8. P. 771. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00771

93. Wartberg L., Kriston L., Thomasius R. Internet gaming disorder and problematic social media use in a representative sample of German adolescents: Prevalence estimates, comorbid depressive symptoms and related psychosocial aspects // Computers in Human Behavior. 2020. № 103. P. 31–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.014

94. Wenninger H., Cheung C. M. K., Chmielinski M. Understanding envy and users’ responses to envy in the context of social networking sites: a literature review // International Journal of Information Management. 2021. № 4 (58). P. 102303. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102303

95. Woods H. C., Scott H. #Sleepyteens: Social media use in adolescence is associated with poor sleep quality, anxiety, depression and low self-esteem // Journal of Adolescence. 2016. № 51 (51). P. 41–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.05.008

96. Yoon S., Kleinman M., Mertz J., Brannick M. Is social network site usage related to depression? A eta-analysis of Facebook** — depression relations relations // Journal of Affective Disorders. 2019. № 248. P. 65–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.026