Digest

Ryzhov B. N. The system of motivational oppositions as the basis of psychological individuality


Preuss F., Perevozkina Yu. M. Interconnection and types of social relations of role socialization system formation: metasystem approach


Ryzhov B. N. The actual-self, ideal-self and hidden-self (with Translation into English by L. A. Mashkova)


Ryzhov B. N., Tarasova А. А. Emotional Perception of Architectural Objects of 1920–1930s by Moscow Students (with Translation into English by L. A. Mashkova)


Kondratyev V. M. The Problem of Balance between Morality and Law in Human Education (with a Translation into English)


Ryzhov B. N. Psychological Age of Civilization (translated into English by L. A. Mashkova)


Aleksander T. A Review about Old Age and Disability (translated into English by A. Diniejko and into Russian by О. Leszczak)



A. A. Zych Silver University as an alternative for the polish solutions


B. N. Ryzhov THE PSYCHOLOGICAL AGE OF CIVILIZATION: the XV century, the North Renaissance


Yu. M. Perevozkina, V. G. Fedosov, F. Prusse Functional organization of impasa-role socialization of youth: metasystemic approach


T. Macho, I. V. Lebedeva, M. M. Bicharova. Migration in Europe as systemic phenomenon of the contemporary society


G. Gross, J. S. Frolova From London to Moscow coronations: perceptions of monarchy


Simons G. Tangible threats through intangible means: aspects of BRICS information and communication security


Ryzhov B. N., Mashkova L. A., Stolyarova G. I. Dynamics of motivational indicators in high school

B.N. Ryzhov - Sistem psychology
Partners

WWW.SYSTEMPSYCHOLOGY.RU

 

Nozikova N. V. Principles of modeling in the experimental study of a psychosemantic object: system approach

Журнал » Journal_eng » Journal 38 : Nozikova N. V. Principles of modeling in the experimental study of a psychosemantic object: system approach
    Views: 252

 

UDC 159.9

DOI 10.25688/2223-6872.2021.38.2.02

 

PRINCIPLES OF MODELING IN THE EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

OF A PSYCHOSEMANTIC OBJECT: SYSTEM APPROACH

 

N. V. Nozikova,

PNU, Khabarovsk,

nv_nozikova@bk.ru

 

The article presents the rationale for the application of the methodology of the system approach in modeling the results of the study of a holistic psychosemantic object. Modeling using the procedures of mathematical processing of the results of an experimental study is a universal epistemological form of the research. Main theoretical provisions of the application of modeling methods in a psychological research are summarized. The existing models that reveal the semantic space as a system of signs of a certain reality are considered.

It is proposed to use in a psychosemantic research the epistemological version of the methodology of the system approach — the “algorithm of system research” by A. V. Karpov, which allows us to construct a conceptually complete model of an object in the integrity of its ontological, structural, functional, genetic and integrative plans. The experimental research on the methodological basis of an interdisciplinary and system approach, the psychosemantic paradigm and the theory of similarity will allow us to identify a complex object in the semantic space that is subordinate to a specific goal, perform its analysis, establish its system organization and propose a conceptual model of a complete psychosemantic prototype object. The application of a systematic approach to the cognition of complex psychosemantic objects will allow us to establish and reveal new patterns in human psychology.

 

Keywords: system approach; system research algorithm; model; psychosemantics; semantic space; psychosemantic system; family purposefulness; family; values.

 

For citation: Nozikova N. V. Principles of modeling in the experimental study of a psychosemantic object: system approach // Systems Psychology and Sociology. 2021. № 2 (38). P. 14–22. DOI 10.25688/2223- 6872.2021.38.2.02

 

Nozikova Natalya Valentinovna, PhD in Psychology, associate professor. Associate Professor of the Department of Psychology at the Pacific State University, Khabarovsk, Russia.

E-mail: nv_nozikova@bk.ru

ORCID: 0000-0002-3467-0729

 

References

 

1. Afanas’ev V. G., Solomin I. L., Solomina L. Yu. Psixosemanticheskoe issledovanie motivacii sportsmenov vy`sokoj kvalifikacii [Psychosemantic study of the motivation of highly qualified athletes] // Sportivny`j psixolog [Sports psychologist]. 2019. № 1 (52). P. 59–62.

2. Dotsenko E. L. Semantika mezhlichnostnogo obshheniya: dis. ... d-ra psixol. nauk [Semantics of interpersonal communication: dis. ... dr. psychol. sciences]. M., 2000. 510 p.

3. Docenko E. L., Xamzina Yu. S., Xamzin T. X. Psixosemanticheskij analiz ry`nka treningov lichnoj e`ffektivnosti: e`skiz metodiki [Psychosemantic analysis of the market for personal effectiveness trainings: a sketch of the methodology] // Organizacionnaya psixologiya [Organizational psychology]. 2019. № 9 (3). P. 103–119.

4. Karpov A. V. Metasistemnaya organizaciya individual`ny`x kachestv lichnosti [Metasystem organization of individual personality traits]. Yaroslavl’: YarGU, 2018. 744 p.

5. Nozikova N. V. Analiz funkcional`noj organizacii psixosemanticheskoj sistemy` semejnoj celenapravlennosti [Analyzing the functional organization of psychosemantic system of purpusefulness in families] // Kul`turno-istoricheskaya psixologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology]. 2018. Vol. 14. № 1. P. 65–77. DOI: 10.17759/chp.2018140108

6. Petrenko V. F. Mnogomernoe soznanie: psixosemanticheskaya paradigma [Multidimensional consciousness: the psychosemantic paradigm]. M.: Novy`j xronograf, 2010. 440 p.

7. Petrenko V. F., Dedyukina E. A. Kommunikativnaya specifika mezhkul`turnogo vospriyatiya xudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya (na materiale fil`ma «Samsara») [Communicative specificity of intercultural perception of a work of art (based on the film “Samsara”)] // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta texnologii i dizajna. Seriya 26. Iskusstvovedenie. Filologicheskie nauki. [Bulletin of the St. Petersburg State University of Technology and Design. Series 26. Art Criticism. Philological Sciences]. 2019. № 4. P. 83–89.

8. Proxorov A. O. Semanticheskie prostranstva psixicheskix sostoyanij. [Semantic spaces of mental states]. Dubna: Feniks, 2002. 280 p.

9. Proxorov A. O. Strukturno-funkcional`naya model` mental`noj regulyacii psixicheskix sostoyanij sub``ekta [Structural-functional model of mental regulation of mental states of the subject] // Psixologicheskij zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. 2020. 41 (1). P. 5–17. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920007852-3

10. Serkin V. P. Izmenenie obraza mira, obraza zhizni i predstavlenij o sebe pri perezhivanii e`kstremal`noj situacii: novy`e e`mpiricheskie danny`e i rekomendacii [Changing the image of the world, lifestyle and ideas about oneself when experiencing an extreme situation: new empirical data and recommendations] // Lichnost` v e`kstremal`ny`x usloviyax i krizisny`x situaciyax zhiznedeyatel`nosti. [Personality in Extreme Conditions and Crisis Situations of Life]. 2015. № 5. P. 322–334.

11. Serkin V. P. Psixosemantika [Psychosemantics]. M.: Yurait, 2016. 318 p.

12. Solomin I. L. Praktikum po psixodiagnostike. Psixosemanticheskie metody` [Workshop on psychodiagnostics. Psychosemantic methods]. SPb.: Peterburgskij gosudarstvenny`j universitet putej soobshheniya, 2013. 96 p.

13. Solomin I. L. Ispol`zovanie metodiki czvetovy`x metafor dlya diagnostiki struktury` e`mocional`ny`x otnoshenij shkol`nikov [Using the method of color metaphors for diagnosing the structure of emotional relationships in schoolchildren] // Pedagogicheskaya diagnostika [Pedagogical diagnostics]. 2015. № 2 P. 75–86.

14. Nozikova N. V. Family model based on the system approach // Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference «Far East Con» (ISCFEC 2020). Atlantis Press, 2020. P. 1437–1443. DOI: 10.2991/ aebmr.k.200312.197

15. Ravluk G. Psychosemantic research of social representations ideas about family life of youth // The Pedagogical Process: Theory and Practice. 2016. № 1. P. 93–98. DOI:10.28925/2078-1687.2016.1.9398

16. Savchenko O. Psychosemantic tools of self-assessing individual reflectivity // East European Journal of Psycholinguistics. 2019. № 6 (2). P. 98–106. DOI: 10.29038/eejpl.2019.6.2.sav