Ryzhov B. N. The system of motivational oppositions as the basis of psychological individuality

Preuss F., Perevozkina Yu. M. Interconnection and types of social relations of role socialization system formation: metasystem approach

Ryzhov B. N. The actual-self, ideal-self and hidden-self (with Translation into English by L. A. Mashkova)

Ryzhov B. N., Tarasova А. А. Emotional Perception of Architectural Objects of 1920–1930s by Moscow Students (with Translation into English by L. A. Mashkova)

Kondratyev V. M. The Problem of Balance between Morality and Law in Human Education (with a Translation into English)

Ryzhov B. N. Psychological Age of Civilization (translated into English by L. A. Mashkova)

Aleksander T. A Review about Old Age and Disability (translated into English by A. Diniejko and into Russian by О. Leszczak)

A. A. Zych Silver University as an alternative for the polish solutions

B. N. Ryzhov THE PSYCHOLOGICAL AGE OF CIVILIZATION: the XV century, the North Renaissance

Yu. M. Perevozkina, V. G. Fedosov, F. Prusse Functional organization of impasa-role socialization of youth: metasystemic approach

T. Macho, I. V. Lebedeva, M. M. Bicharova. Migration in Europe as systemic phenomenon of the contemporary society

G. Gross, J. S. Frolova From London to Moscow coronations: perceptions of monarchy

Simons G. Tangible threats through intangible means: aspects of BRICS information and communication security

Ryzhov B. N., Mashkova L. A., Stolyarova G. I. Dynamics of motivational indicators in high school

B.N. Ryzhov - Sistem psychology




    Views: 500



E. S. Romanova,

MCU, Moscow,



The article presents an analysis of the psychological techniques used by F. M. Dostoevsky in his characters’ describing. The author examines the nature and actions of the characters, analyzing the features of their monologues and dialogues, the connection of their external manifestations with internal experiences. The author draws special attention to portrait descriptions, emphasizing their role in revealing the inner world of the characters. According to the author’s opinion, the change of the character’s appearance can also characterize him, thus such descriptions are noted and considered as methods of character’s representation and emotions.

The author also pays special attention to the characters’ speech: to what they say and how define themselves and others. Dostoevsky’s estimates as well as characters’ estimates, used in their speech, both can build the picture of the world of the relationships in the minds of the readers, created by the writer. Presenting the characters, Dostoevsky can directly characterize them, and that gives the readers to see his attitude to them. Dostoevsky invisibly instills in the readers their sympathy and antipathy towards certain people and phenomena with all his skill of the great artist-and-psychologist. A writer can directly define the characters through the speech of the other characters or their own speech, and that is why some of the epithets, nevertheless, accurately convey the writer’s attitude and his vision in accordance with the context.

According to the author’s opinion, the best definitions of the characters are descriptive names, comparisons and dreams, in spite of the fact of their frequent ambiguity. The name becomes not just a conscious literary device, but an integral part of the image. Due to the fact, that any person always corresponds to his name, Dostoevsky calls characters so that everyone can guess his nature or behavior towards other people. This also applies to the continuous repetitive descriptions of the characters, including metaphors and comparisons, that stresses the most bright feature of the person. The author also draws attention to the description of the space, where Dostoevsky’s characters live.

The aim of the article is to study the psychological techniques that reveal the inner world of Dostoevsky’s characters.

Thus, the psychological approach to the analysis of Dostoevsky’s works allows a deeper understanding of the motives of his characters ‘ actions, contributes to ambiguous assessment of their personality, that leads the reader to a new understanding of the author’s works.


Keywords: psychological analysis; psychological techniques; creativity; inner world; psychological profile; describing a character.

For citation: Romanova E. S. Psychological techniques for describing the characters in F. M. Dostoevsky’s works // Systems Psychology and Sociology. 2019. № 3 (31). P. 55–67. DOI: 10.25688/2223-6872.2019.31.3.06


Romanova Evgeniya Sergeevna, doctor of psychological sciences, professor, acting director of the Institute of psychology, sociology and social relations at the Moscow City University, Head of the Department of general and practical psychology at the Institute of psychology, sociology and social relations of the Moscow City University, Moscow, Russia.

E-mail: RomanovaES@mgpu.ru





1. Alekseev P. V. F. M. Dostoevsky and the East. Gorno-Altaysk: BITS GAGU, 2017. 152 p.

2. Bursov B. I. Dostoevsky’s personality. The novel study. Leningrad: Sovetskiy writer,1979. 679 p.

3. Vygotsky L. S. Psychology of art / ed. by M. G. Yaroshevsky. Moscow: Pedagogy,1987. 344 p.

4. Dostoevsky. Materials and research. Vol. 21/ ed. by N. Budanova, K. Barsht. Saint-Petersburg: NestorIstoriya, 2016. 529 p.

5. Dostoevsky F. M. Complete works in 30 vol. Leningrad., 1972–1986.

6. Grossman L. Balzac and Dostoevsky // Journal of art and literature.1914. May № 5. P. 87–96.

7. Historiogenesis and current state of the Russian mentality / ed. by V. A. Koltsov, E. V. Kharitonova. M.: Institute of psychology RAS, 2015. P. 321–331.

8. Kasatkina T. A. Sacred in everyday life: a two-part image in F. M. Dostoevsky’s works. Moscow: IMLI RAN, 2015. 528 p.

9. Koltsova V. A., Holodovich E. N. The embodiment of spirituality in the person and work of Fyodor Dostoyevsky. Moscow: Institute of psychology RAS, 2013. 304 p.

10. Leongard K. Accentuation of personality. Rostov-nа-Dony: Phenix, 2000. 544 p.

11. Meyer G. A. Light in the night: (On «Crime and punishment»): the Experience of slow reading. Frankfurt: Sowing, 1967. 518 p.

12. Romanova E. S. Graphic methods in practical psychology. Moscow: Aspect Press, 2011. 400 p.

13. Ryzhov B. N. System psychology. Second edition. Moscow: T8 Izdatelskiye Technologii, 2017. 356 p.

14. Ryabov V. V., Romanova E. S. Psychographic aspects in F. M. Dostoevsky’s works. Moscow: Moscow state pedagogical university, 2007. 176 p.

15. Teplov B. M. Psychologist’s notes on fiction reading // Selected works: In 2 t. T. 1. Moscow: Pedagogy, 1985. 328 p.

16. Tolstoy L. N. Collected works in 90 vol. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya Literatura, 1937. Vol. 47. 637 p.

17. Chirkov N. M. Dostoevsky’s style. Moscow: Nauka, 1964. 158 p.

18. Berdyaev N. Dostoevsky: an interpretation / trans. by D. Attwater. San Rafael: Semantron Press, 2009. 576 p.

19. Malmberg C.-J. Stjärnan i foten [The star in the foot]. Stockholm: W&W, 2013. 635 p.

20. Scruton R. The Soul of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014. 216 p.

21. Williams R. Dostoevsky: language, faith and fiction. London: Continuum, 2008. 300 p.

22. Horvath Gesa S. Dostoevsky’s idea of the Golden age. Modern subjectivity in philosophical and poetic perspective (Demons) // Dostoevsky Journal. 2017. V. 18. № 1 (Jan 2017). P. 37–48.

23. Jensen K. A. Nietzsche and Dostoevsky: on the verge of nihilism // Dostoevsky Journal. 2018. V. 19. № 1 (Dec 2018). P. 85–89.

24. Meacham W. A Case Study in Human Behaviour, Motivation and Abnormal Psychology of Fyodor Dostoyevsky // Owlcation. Psychology. Jun. 2016. URL: https://owlcation.com/social-sciences/AbnormalPsychology-Case-Study-of-Fyodor-Dostoyevsky (дата обращения: 25.01.2019)