Ryzhov B. N. The system of motivational oppositions as the basis of psychological individuality
Preuss F., Perevozkina Yu. M. Interconnection and types of social relations of role socialization system formation: metasystem approach
Ryzhov B. N. The actual-self, ideal-self and hidden-self (with Translation into English by L. A. Mashkova)
Ryzhov B. N., Tarasova А. А. Emotional Perception of Architectural Objects of 1920–1930s by Moscow Students (with Translation into English by L. A. Mashkova)
Kondratyev V. M. The Problem of Balance between Morality and Law in Human Education (with a Translation into English)
Ryzhov B. N. Psychological Age of Civilization (translated into English by L. A. Mashkova)
Aleksander T. A Review about Old Age and Disability (translated into English by A. Diniejko and into Russian by О. Leszczak)
A. A. Zych Silver University as an alternative for the polish solutions
B. N. Ryzhov THE PSYCHOLOGICAL AGE OF CIVILIZATION: the XV century, the North Renaissance
Yu. M. Perevozkina, V. G. Fedosov, F. Prusse Functional organization of impasa-role socialization of youth: metasystemic approach
T. Macho, I. V. Lebedeva, M. M. Bicharova. Migration in Europe as systemic phenomenon of the contemporary society
G. Gross, J. S. Frolova From London to Moscow coronations: perceptions of monarchy
Simons G. Tangible threats through intangible means: aspects of BRICS information and communication security
Ryzhov B. N., Mashkova L. A., Stolyarova G. I. Dynamics of motivational indicators in high school
WWW.SYSTEMPSYCHOLOGY.RU
A. B. Karpov, EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT — A FACTOR OF WORK MOTIVATION
| Journal_eng » Journal 27 : A. B. Karpov, EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT — A FACTOR OF WORK MOTIVATION |
Views: 757
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT — A FACTOR OF WORK MOTIVATION
A. B. Karpov, NPF Materia Medica Holding, Moscow
The article is devoted to the problem of work engagement, it provides the literature review on this issue. The analysis of the literature reveals the discrepancy between a large number of different theories of motivation for the needs of modern organizations, the absence of a single universal theoretical model of work motivation, and a methodology that can measure the degree of work motivation for a particular activity in an organization. All this would allow the employer to create organizational mechanisms stimulating high labor efficiency. The concept of work engagement as a factor of high productivity of workers is introduced. The article presents the results of the study of work engagement of the employees of the pharmaceutical company LLC “NPF “Materia Medica Holding”. According to the results of the study there is a discussion of the patterns of the work engagement factors, subjective perception of the engagement of colleagues and objective engagement in different functional groups, as well as the relationship of engagement with the effectiveness of the employees and turnover in different divisions in the period before and after the research.
Keywords: engagement; work motivation; satisfaction; labor efficiency; turnover; business indicators; organizational loyalty; effectiveness.
For citation: Karpov A. B. Employee engagement — a factor of work motivation // Systems psychology and Sociology. 2018. № 3 (27). P. 74–83.
References
1. Adizes I. On the threshold of the management revolution // Harvard Business Review – Russia. 2017. № 125. P. 8–12. 2. Engagement: The Research Methodology. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://axesgroup.ru/engagement/metodology/ (Accessed: 27.02.2018). 3. Egorova A. S. Work Engagement: 7 steps to understanding. M .: Infra, 2014. 314 p. 4. Lipatov S. A. The problem of human interaction with organization: concepts and directions of research // Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology. 2012. № 1. P. 85–96. 5. Michaels E., Handfield-Jones X., Ekselrod E. War for talents. M.: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber, 2005. 272 p. 6. Mandrikova E. Y. Work enthusiasm: a review of modern foreign inestigations // Psychology in the university. 2012. № 6. P. 53–64. 7. Motivation of personnel in a modern organization: textbook / under the general / ed. by S.Yu. Trapitsyn. St. Petersburg: Knizhnij dom, 2007. 240 p. 8. Onuchin A. N. Engagement investigation // The Human Resources Times. 2013. № 24. P. 29–35. 9. Rozin M. Consultant’s advice: The secret of engagement // Vedomosti. 2013. № 242. P. 8. 10. Svergun O. Employees engagement: a valuable advantage // Handbook of personnel management. 2012. № 8. P. 56–64. 11. Bakker A. B., Leiter M. P. Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research. Taylor & Francis, 2010. Р.182–196. 12. Global Human Capital Trends 2017: The new organization — Different by Design, Deloitte Development LLC and Deloitte University Press, 2016. URL: https://www2.del oitte.com/global/en/pages-/human-capital/articles/introduction-human-capital-trends.html (Accessed: 16.05.2017). 13. Hewitt Associates. (2004). Employee engagement higher at double-digit growth companies. Research Brief. Hewitt associates LLC. URL: http://www.connectthedotsconsulting.com/documents/Engagement/EE%20Engagement%20at%20DD%20Growth%20Companies%202012.pdf. (Accessed: 16.05.2017). 14. Kahn W. A. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work // Academy of Management Journal. 1990. № 33. Р. 692–724. 15. Schaufeli W. B., Salanova M. Work engagement: An emerging psychological concept and its implications for organizations // Research in Social Issues in Management (Volume 5): Managing Social and Ethical Issues in Organizations. 2007. Р. 135–177. 16. Shaw K. An engagement strategy process for communicators» // Strategic Communication Management. 2005. V. 9. № 3. Р. 26–29. 17. The Gallup Organization (2006). The Gallup Organization: Engagement Predicts Earnings Per Share. Washington. [online]. URL: http://www.sheila-scott.co.uk/articles /Engaged-scott-final.pdf (Accessed: 16.05.2017)
|