SYSTEMS PSYCHOLOGY
AND SOCIOLOGY

    Views: 2301

MACROERGONOMICS: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON ERGONOMICS

I.I. Vasil’eva, Institute of Psychology, Russian Science Academy, Moscow

The article provides an overview of macroergonomics as a new paradigm of ergonomics based mainly on English-language articles. The background of its occurrence, basic concepts, statements and methods of macroergonomics as well as modern state, personalities and an example of the specific macroergonomic case of safety culture forming are considered. It is demonstrated that the macroergonomics has arisen as result of through-boundaries development of the traditional subject of ergonomics and shows a clear trend to integration with organizational psychology. The necessity of development of the systemic-theoretical model of macroergonomics is specified and the ergatic system is considered as proper one.

Keywords: macroergonomics; ergonomics; organization psychology; labour organization; safety culture; participatory ergonomics; work system; safety at petroleum distribution operation; safety at power plant; activity approach.

References

1. Abramova V. N. Organizational Psychology, Organizational Culture and Safety Culture in the Nuclear Power Industry. M.: Concern «Energoatom»: Prognoz; Obninsk. 2009. 257 p.
2. Abramova V. N., Belexov V. V., Bel’skaya E. G. Psychological Means in Personnel Trainings at Nuclear Power Plants. M.: Energoatomizdat, 1988. 191 p.
3. Anoxin A. N. Russian Ergonomics and Russian Ergonomic Society: Status and Trends // Human Factors: Problems of Psychology and Ergonomics. 2014. № 68 (1). Р. 4-15.
4. Vasil’eva I. I. The Safety of Ergatic Systems // Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference «Psychology of Labor, Engineering Psychology and Ergonomics 2014» (ERGO 2014). SPb.: United ergonomic association, 2014. Р. 396-402.
5. Vasil’eva L I. Psychology for Power Industry: Towards the Safety and the Efficiency. Moscow, 2012. 272 p.
6. Zhuravlev G. E. The System-Psychological Approach to the Problem of Safety Culture in the Power Energy // Journal of Psychology. 1997. № 18 (3). Р. 36-44.
7. Zhuravlev G. E., Kupnyj V. I., Danilov V. M., Vtornikov V. E. Human Factors of the Shelter’s Personnel Save Activity // From Theory to Practice: Psychological Foundations of Safety Culture in Nuclear Installations (Ed. Zhuravlev G.E.). M.: Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, 1997. P. 113-136. URL: http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_ Public/32/020/32020490.pdf
8. Zhuravlev G. E., Lomakin B. V., Sakov B. A. Macroergonomic Problems of Power Plants: Technical View // Applied Ergonomics. 1991. Is. 1. P. 40-48.
9. Piskoppel’ A. A., Shhedrovickij L. P. From «Man-Machine» System to «Socio-technical» System // Psychological Issues. 1982. № 3. P. 15-25.
10. Carayon P., Smith M. J. Work Organization and Ergonomics // Applied Ergonomics. 2000. V. 31. № 6. P. 649-662.
11. Hendrick H. W. An Overview of Macroergonomics // Macroergonomics: Theory, Methods, and Applications. 2002. P. 1-24.
12. Hendrick H. W. Ergonomics in Organizational Design and Management // Ergonomics. 1991. V 34. №. 6. P. 743-756.
13. Hendrick H. W., Kleiner B. (ed.). Macroergonomics: Theory, Methods, and Applications. CRC Press, 2016. 412 p.
14. Imada A. S. A Macroergonomic Approach to Reducing Work-Related Injuries // Macroergonomics: Theory, Methods and Applications. 2002. P. 151-172.
15. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). IAEA Mission Report (Onagawa and Tokyo, July 30-August 11, 2012). Vienna: IAEA, 2012. 92 p.
16. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Safety Culture. (Safety Series No. 75-INSAG-4). Vienna: IAEA, 1991. 31 p.
17. Kleiner B. M. Macroergonomics: Analysis and Design of Work Systems // Applied Ergonomics. 2006. V 37. №. 1. P. 81-89.
18. Meshkati N. Human Factors in Large-Scale Technological Systems’ Accidents: Three Mile Island, Bhopal, Chernobyl // Industrial Crisis Quarterly. 1991. V. 5. № 2. P. 133-154.
19. Meshkati N. Safety Culture in Nuclear Power Plants: Human Performance, Organizational Factors, and Socio-Cultural Context // Оттеориикпрактике: психологическиеосновыкультурыбезопасности атомнойэнергетикиипромышленности [From theory to practice: psychological background of safety culture] / ред.: ЖуравлевГ. Е. М.: ЦЭМИ, 1997. P. 93-111.
20. Robertson M. M. Macroergonomics: A work System Design Perspective // Proceedings of the SELF-ACE 2001 Conference — Ergonomics for Changing Work. 2001. V. 1. P. 67-77. URL: http://www.ergonomie-self.org/documents/36eme-Montreal-2001/PDF-ENG/v1-07b-ROBERTSON.pdf (accessed June 9, 2015).
21. Rochlin G. I., Meier A. V. Nuclear Power Operations: A Cross-Cultural Perspective // Annual Review of Energy and the Environment. 1994. V. 19. №. 1. P. 153-187.
22. Ryu A. (Iris), Meshkati N. Why You Haven’t Heard About Onagawa Nuclear Power Station after the Earthquake and Tsunami of March 11, 2011. URL: http://www-bcf.usc.edu/~meshkati/Onagawa%20 NPS-%20Final%2003-10-13.pdf (accessed February 26, 2014).
23. Trist E. L., Bamforth K. W. Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method // Human relations. 1951. V. 4. № 3. P. 3-38.